Academic Freedom and Standards of Conduct
Professional Ethics Statement
It is University
policy that "employees
are expected at all times, to respect the rights of the University, it's
students, visitors and other members of the University community. Inherent
in this responsibility is the obligation to be courteous, respectful,
honest, and to protect the University environment."
On April 3, 1995, the University Faculty Senate adopted the following
statement on professional ethics, taken from the 1990 edition of the AAUP Policy
Documents and Report.
- Introduction
From its inception, the American Association of University
Professors has recognized that membership in the academic profession
carries with
it special responsibilities. The Association has consistently affirmed
these responsibilities in major policy statements, providing guidance to
professors in such matters as their utterances as citizens, the exercise
of their responsibilities to students and colleagues, and their conduct
when resigning from an institution or when undertaking sponsored research.
| 1961 |
Statement on Recruitment and Resignation of Faculty Members |
| 1964 |
A Statement on Extramural Utterances (Clarification of sec.
1c of the 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and
Tenure) |
| 1965 |
On Preventing Conflicts of Interest in Government-Sponsored
Research at Universities |
| 1966 |
Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities |
| 1967 |
Joint Statement on Rights and Freedoms of Students |
| 1970 |
Council Statement on Freedom and Responsibility |
| 1976 |
On Discrimination |
| 1984 |
Sexual Harassment: Suggested Policy and Procedures for Handling
Complaints |
The Statement on Professional Ethics that follows sets forth those general
standards that serve as a reminder of the variety of responsibilities assumed
by all members of the profession.
In the enforcement of ethical standards, the academic profession differs
from those of law and medicine, whose associations act to ensure the integrity
of members engaged in private practice. In the academic profession the
individual institution of higher learning provides this assurance and so
should normally handle questions concerning propriety of conduct within
its own framework by reference to a faculty group. The Association supports
such local action and stands ready, through the general secretary and Committee
B, to counsel with members of the academic community concerning questions
of professional ethics and to inquire into complaints when local consideration
is impossible or inappropriate. If the alleged offense is deemed sufficiently
serious to raise the possibility of adverse action, the procedures should
be in accordance with the 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom
and Tenure, the 1958 Statement of Procedural Standards in Faculty
Dismissal Proceedings, or the applicable provisions of the Association's Recommended
Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom and Tenure.
- The Statement
- Professors, guided by a deep conviction of the worth and dignity
of the advancement of knowledge, recognize the special responsibilities
placed
upon them. Their primary responsibility to their subject is to seek
and to state the truth as they see it. To this end professors devote
their
energies to developing and improving their scholarly competence.
They accept the obligation to exercise critical self-discipline and
judgment
in using,
extending, and transmitting knowledge. They practice intellectual
honesty. Although professors may follow subsidiary interests, these
interests
must never seriously hamper or compromise their freedom of inquiry.
- As
teachers, professors encourage the free pursuit of learning in
their students. They hold before them the best scholarly and
ethical standards
of their discipline. Professors demonstrate respect for students
as individuals and adhere to their proper roles as intellectual guides
and counselors.
Professors make every reasonable effort to foster honest academic
conduct
and to ensure that their evaluations of students reflect each student's
true merit. They respect the confidential nature of the relationship
between professor and student. They avoid any exploitation, harassment,
or discriminatory
treatment of students. They acknowledge significant academic or scholarly
assistance from them. They protect their academic freedom.
- As colleagues,
professors have obligations that derive from common membership
in the community of scholars. Professors do not discriminate
against or harass colleagues. They respect and defend the free inquiry
of associates. In the exchange of criticism and ideas professors show
due respect for the opinions of others. Professors acknowledge academic
debt
and strive to be objective in their professional judgment of colleagues.
Professors accept their share of faculty responsibilities for the governance
of their institution.
- As members of an academic institution, professors
seek above all to be effective teachers and scholars. Although
professors observe
the stated
regulations of the institution, provided the regulations do not contravene
academic freedom, they maintain their right to criticize and seek revision.
Professors give due regard to their paramount responsibilities within
their institution in determining the amount and character of work
done outside
it. When considering the interruption or termination of their service,
professors recognize the effect of their decision upon the program of
the institution and give due notice of their intentions.
- As members of their community, professors have
the rights and obligations of other citizens. Professors measure the
urgency of these obligations
in the light of their responsibilities to their subject, to their students,
to their profession, and to their institution. When they speak or act as
private persons they avoid creating the impression of speaking or acting
for their college or university. As citizens engaged in a profession that
depends upon freedom for its health and integrity, professors have a particular
obligation to promote conditions of free inquiry and to further public
understanding of academic freedom. (Added by Faculty Senate 4/95; renumbered
2/99) (Last editorial update 2/12/99.)
|