Last revised 1999/09/09 |
Solution for Problem 1:
We have a problem in one-dimensional motion with constant
acceleration, for which the equations are
v = v0 + a t
If we choose t=0 at the beginning of the car's motion, then the information we have available is
and the working equations become
(1): X = 0 + 0 T + (1/2) A T2
(2): v = 0 + A T
Equation (1) can be immediately solved to get X = (1/2) A T 2 and we never need equation (2).
Solution for Problem 2
Solution 1:
Take t=0 at the beginning of the acceleration, as in problem 1. Then
we have
x0 = 0 v0 = unknown v(T) = 0 [because the car comes to a stop] x(T) = X |
This time we must use the velocity equation to get v0:
v = v0 + a t 0 = v0 - A T v0 = A T |
after which we can use the distance equation:
x = x0 + v0 t + (1/2) a t2 x = 0 T + (A T) T - (1/2) A T 2 x = (1/2) A T 2 |
Interestingly, we get the same answer as in problem 1. A car stopping from a set velocity travels exactly the same distance as a car accelerating at the same rate and reaching the same velocity. Can we get this answer with less algebra?
Solution 2:
Take t=0 at the end of the deceleration instead. When we do this, it
is most natural to put x=0 at that point, too. We could, but since we
have just worked the problem with x=0 at the beginning we will stick
with that choice. Then we have
v0 = 0 x0 = X x(-T) = 0 |
0 = X + 0 T - (1/2) A T2 X = (1/2) A T2 |
In general, it is a good guess to set t=0 at the spot where you have the most variables which are either known or wanted.