|
FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION ACT, FISCAL YEARS 2004 AND 2005
SPEECH OF
HON. JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY OF ILLINOIS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Tuesday,
July 15, 2003
The House in Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union had under
consideration the bill (H.R. 1950) to authorize appropriations for the Department
of State for the fiscal years 2004 and 2005, to authorize appropriations under
the Arms Export Control Act and the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 for security
assistance for fiscal years 2004 and 2005,
and for
other purposes:
Ms. SCHAKOWSKY: Mr. Chairman, I am pleased today to speak in
support of
my amendment to H.R. 1950, the State Department Authorization
bill,
which expresses the sense of the Congress that the Secretary of
State should
provide adequate resources to United States Embassies and Consular
Offices
in order to meet the workload requirements for visa application
processing.
The State Department recently issued a rule requiring nearly all visa applicants
who wish to come to the United States for travel, business, or study to have
personal interviews at Embassies or Consular Offices. This rule will significantly
increase the amount of work and time Embassies and Consulates must give to
each visa applicant. In Fiscal Year 2002, nearly 5.8 million business and tourist
visas were issued and it is estimated that, in some countries, as few as 20
percent of applicants were required to be interviewed. While I support necessary
security precautions, this new rule will clearly result in months of backlogs
that could seriously jeopardize American business, education, and tourism unless
these offices are provided with adequate resources and personnel to handle
the increased
workload.
Unfortunately, the Secretary of State has expressed to U.S. Embassies and
Consulates that he "expects and accepts that many posts will face processing
backlogs for the indefinite future." Furthermore, the message from the State
Department in Washington, DC, is that, while posts can request more personnel,
for the most part, they "must implement the new interview guidelines using
existing resources. Posts should not, repeat not, use overtime to deal with
additional workload requirements."
Requiring our Foreign Service officers to take on a vastly increased workload
without also providing the resources necessary to support that work may actually
undermine our national security. It is unclear that overworked staff who are
forced to conduct personal interviews with thousands of visa applicants will
be able to adequately identify terrorists and other potentially harmful visitors
in what are reportedly two to three minute interviews. Instead, these workers
will be more likely to miss important details in visa applications as they
rush to keep up with additional work requirements. Only by providing sufficient
resources to meet the new interview requirements can we ensure that the steps
we take to implement more stringent security protections will effectively safeguard
our
Nation
from those who may wish to do us harm.
Furthermore, if we are to remain a respected nation and an ally to countries
around the world, it is critical that people be able to travel to the United
States for business and pleasure without unnecessary hurdles of burdens. It
is also critical for our economy, which depends on tourism and on conducting
business with foreign nationals in order to stay strong, that people be able
to travel to the United States without unnecessary inconveniences. Long wait
times and growing backlogs of visa applications will serve to do the opposite
and discourage people from coming to the United States to spend money and conduct
business.
I have heard from my constituents of people missing business meetings, important
family events, and opportunities to study at American universities because
it took too long for their visa application to be processed. For example, we
have heard about three month waiting periods in Israel, one of our closest
allies, which prevented a young Israeli from coming to the U.S. to work as
a camp counselor. In another example, a group of Indian performers who were
set to tour the United States will miss their performance in Chicago this weekend
because they were not approved in time. And three people from Jakarta will
miss their business meeting next week because their visa was not accepted in
time. Finally, a young man had to postpone a wedding reception he had been
planning for months
because visa
backlogs prevented his fiancée from getting to the United States from South Korea
in time.
It is because of situations like these and countless others that we must
provide our Embassies and Consulates with adequate resources to meet the needs
of visa applicants. It is because of our national security interests that we
must provide our Foreign Service officers the resources they need to do their
jobs well. I am pleased that this amendment was accepted into the en bloc amendment,
and I thank Chairman Hyde and Ranking Member
LANTOS for
their support.
Source: Government Printing Office
From CQ Congressional Record Service
Providing government documents on demand, in context.
© 2003 Congressional Quarterly Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|