From: Rys, Gail
Sent: Mon 2/28/2005 11:31 PM
To: Rich, Daniel; barnekov@UDel.Edu
Cc: Clark, Chris; gbear@UDel.Edu; marym@UDel.Edu; cmason@udel.edu
Subject: RE: Educational Specialist degree
Dear Dan and all,
I am attaching a letter from Dr. Joseph Prus from the
National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) Program Approval Board in
support of the School of Education's requested changes to the School Psychology
program that is currently being considered by Faculty Senate. As the
professional organization for School Psychologists, NASP is the organization
that reviews School Psych programs as part of the NCATE accreditation
process.
To answer your questions below:
1. NASP guidelines call for a minimum of 60 credit hours of coursework
(including the internship) for a School Psychology program to be
accredited. However, a 60 credit hour master's program is both unusual
and potentially financially punitive to graduates as they begin their
professional careers. As you know, most school districts use a matrix
that includes highest degree earned and years of experience to determine
salaries for their professional staff. They do not differentiate between a 30
credit hour master's degree and a 60 credit hour master's degree. To most
school districts, a master's is a master's and salary increases are only
awarded when professionals reach levels such as Master's + 15 credits, Master's
+ 30 credits, etc. Thus, if we only awarded one master's degree at the
conclusion of 60 credits, our graduates would begin their professional careers
earning much less than colleagues who had graduated from other master's programs,
most of which are in the 30-33 credit hour range. As a point of
reference, our current Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)
degree is a 54 credit hour program, so our School Psychology students complete
more coursework than our EdD gradutes.
2. Regarding the M.A. versus M.S. degree question, I relly
don't have a good answer for you. The M.A. degree pre-dates both George
Bear and me - it was in place as an M.A. when both of us arrived at UD in the
late 80's. In looking at programs at other universities, both M.A. and
M.Ed. programs are common, M.S. degrees in School
Psychology are rare. Also, as a point of reference, currently in the SOE
we have 5 M.Ed. majors, 3 M.A. majors and one Master of Instruction.
Although UD has other M.S. degrees, there are none currently in the SOE.
3. The Ed.S. degree is
the most commonly recognized and awarded degree within the profession of School
Psychology and it is common in other advanced professional programs in
education as well. For instance, many universities have Ed.S. degrees in Reading that are
in excess of 30-33 credits. Since our graduate program in
When I complete the U.S. News and World Report survey that ranks graduate programs,
it asks questions about our master's degree students, our doctoral degree
students AND our specialist degree students. Right now, our second and
third year school psychology students (who are non-matriculated students) are
not being captured in the reported data at all since USNWR is very specific
that students have to be in a specialist DEGREE program to be counted.
This fact plus a desire to be consistent with peer institutions and NASP
recommendations prompts the
Thank you, Dan, for considering these comments. Please contact George or
me if you have follow-up questions.
Gail
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich, Daniel [mailto:drich@UDel.Edu]
Sent: Mon 2/21/2005
To: Rys, Gail; barnekov@UDel.Edu
Cc: Clark, Chris; gbear@UDel.Edu; marym@UDel.Edu
Subject: RE: Educational Specialist degree
Gail:
Thanks for the update. I have a few questions.
1. Since the students need 60 credits plus an internship for certification, why
isn't that required for the UD M.A. degree?
2. Since it is a professional degree, why aren't we awarding an MS or Master of
School Psychology degree instead of an M.A.
3. Why do we need the new EdS
degree when we can award an MS degree at the end of the program.
It seems clear that if there is to be a second degree, it should be after all
requirements are completed.
Thanks,
Dan
________________________________
From: Rys, Gail [mailto:gailrys@UDel.Edu]
Sent: Sun 2/20/2005 11:08 PM
To: Rich, Daniel; barnekov@UDel.Edu
Cc: Clark, Chris; gbear@UDel.Edu; marym@UDel.Edu
Subject: Educational Specialist degree
Dear Dan and Tim,
On the advice of both Chris and Chuck Mason, current chair of the Faculty
Senate Graduate Committee, I wanted to drop you a note and give you a heads up
on an agenda item that will soon be appearing on the Faculty Senate
Coordinating Committee's schedule. As you may know, the School Psychology
program is currently a 3 year program: students receive an M.A. in School
Psychology after the first full year of coursework (30 credits), and then
become Non-degree students in the second year (in which they complete an
additional 24 credits) and the third year (in which they complete a 6 credit
hour, full-time internship). They must complete this entire 60 credit hour
program, including the internship, to be eligible for certification as a School
Psychologist under NCATE and NASP requirements.
The Non-degree status of these students in the second and third year has become
increasingly problematic over the last several years. For instance,
although these students have very strong academic profiles, we are no longer
able to "count" them among our fold in the data we report to U.S.
News and World Report because they are not matriculated students.
Additionally, Mary Martin had to intervene a few years ago in order to allow
these non-matriculated students to be allowed to be considered for
assistantships in their second year.
The
>> University of Arizona
>> University of Connecticut
>> Gallaudet University
>> University of South Florida
>> University of Idaho
>> Indiana University
>> University of Kansas
>> Michigan State University
>> University of Missouri
>> Kent State University
>> Lehigh University
>> University of Tennessee
>> College of William and Mary
>> James Madison University
NASP is sending us a letter of support to submit with our documentation to the
Coordinating Committee and the Executive Committee.
Another suggestion made by Chuck Mason was that any members of the Board of
Trustees who might have an education background or be familiar with this degree
could be valuable advocates when the matter comes to the Board. Certainly
someone like Jackie Wilson could be an advocate, and there may be others you
could think of. Although Jim Neal is an engineer, he's also my next door
neighbor, and I could mention it to him if you think it would be appropriate.
I'll await your direction on this.
Please let me (or George Bear) know if you have any
questions or concerns about this proposal, and thank you both for any support
you can lend to this request.
Best wishes,
Gail