University of Delaware
Department of Foreign Languages & Literatures

 

 

 

FLLT 421/621: Methods of Foreign Language Teaching

 

 Required texts

Course Syllabus

Spring  2005


(
Course meets on Wednesday 6-9)

  Instructor: Prof. Jorge H. Cubillos
  Office: 416 Smith Hall 
  Office Hours: M: 4-5 pm, W: 11-12 am  &  by  appointment

  Phone #: 831-2041 
 cubillos@udel.edu
 

Course description and goals

Syllabus

 

 

Welcome to the foreign/second language profession!

 

Required texts:

1. Shrum, Judith & Eileen Glisan. (2004). Teacher's Handbook: Contextualized Language Instruction. 3rd Ed. Boston: Heinle & Heinle

2. Richards, Jack & Rodgers, Theodore. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching.  2nd Ed.  Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

 


Course Description and Course Goals:
Welcome to the foreign language profession! This course seeks to address both theory and practice of foreign language teaching. It is primarily intended to help language instructors experienced and inexperienced to develop understanding of learning and teaching of languages in classroom. Teaching strategies used are lecture with discussion, small-group activities, video commenting, and discussion of class visits and observations.

By the end of this course, students should be able to: 

(i)                 Demonstrate an understanding of current theories of second-language acquisition research.

(ii)               Design lesson plans and communicative projects that reflect current SLA theory and practice.

(iii)             Prepare and use a Picture File to teach a foreign language lessons.

(iv)             Develop the ability to reflect on their teaching and the teaching of others.

(v)               Use technology as a tool for professional development and to promote student learning. 

 

General Assignments and Expectations

  • The participants are expected to read all assignments before each meeting, be prepared to give a critical assessment of the readings, and to participate actively in the classroom and practical projects (see participation grade below).
  • All projects that are assigned outside the class are to be written on a computer and must include all appropriate typed accents in the foreign language.
  • All assignments must be proof read and carefully checked for accuracy of the language.
  • Teamwork is highly encouraged in preparation for the class and for many assignments. This is done to promote and develop collaboration, which can be beneficial to all learners and useful to teachers.
  • Class attendance is required due to the practical aspects of the course: assignments and practices in class. After the first two absences, the participation grade will be lowered by 10 points for each unjustified absence (absences are to be justified with written notes). The participation grade, which is 15% of the final course grade, may reach zero due to excessive absences!
  • Late work will not be accepted, except for unusual circumstances (please talk to me about possible problems ahead of time). 


Graduate students are asked to write a brief research paper on a topic of their choosing.   Research topic must be communicated to the instructor by February 23.  Papers are due on May 11.
 

The course grade will be based on the following criteria:

Undergraduate students

Presentations & participation ……….....

 15%

NB.  (Participating in class discussions. Being present is not enough)

Midterm exam ……………….................

 15%

 

Portfolio projects and assignments (Picture Files with Listening & speaking activities, reading activities)…..........

35%

 

Developmental Assessment Project

20%

Students must start preparing for this project immediately! Please see due date for summary of first visit.

Final exam……………………...............

15%

 


Graduate students

Presentations & participation ………................…

 15%

NB.  (Participating in class discussions. Being present is not enough)

Midterm exam ………………...............................

 15%

 

Portfolios projects and assignments (Picture Files with Listening & speaking activities, reading activities)….................................

35%

 

Research paper  ....................................................

20%

Students must select a topic for the research paper as early as the second week of instruction.

Final exam………………………………...............

15%

 

 

Conceptual Framework

The course Methods of Teaching Foreign Language is based on the University Delaware’s Conceptual Framework, which was developed by a multi-college committee to define the approaches generally used in the university’s teacher education program. The framework is based on the conviction that good teaching requires constant trial and error, thought revision, and reflection. For that reason, a primary goal of  “Methods of Teaching Foreign Language” is not merely to convey content, but to help students develop and practice skills they will need for a career of vital, innovative teaching. These skills begin with personal reflection aimed at improving practice, but they also include using scholarly resources as well as forming partnerships with parents, teachers, and the larger community as a means of defining and resolving problems. Students should read the Conceptual Framework document, which they will find at: University of Delaware's Conceptual Framework document or its brief version here
 

A. Reflective practitioner: All readings, activities, and projects encourage students to think through problems and approaches to teaching. Specific step-by-step models will be provided as well as general tools, and students are encouraged to reflect on these tools and find their way to solve problems. Textbooks present material in a way that invites reflection and problem solving. The activities that accompany the chapters require thoughtful consideration. Finally, discussions, small group work, demonstrations, micro teaching session, portfolio and all projects include reflective exercises.

B. Scholar: In accord with the general way of becoming reflective practitioners, students are encouraged to consider ways of using existing research-based information as means of determining what more they need to learn and how best to learn it. Students are required to include in this effort not only traditional scholarly texts but appropriate Internet sites and community resources as well. This work is not undertaken as separate, isolated assignment; rather, it is part of the routine development of motivational activities, lesson plans, multiple assessments, and other instructional materials the students are writing in the course. Accordingly, students are required to indicate, in written assignments specifically how they are applying this research-based information to the material they are proposing to use with their (future) pupils. Finally, students are challenged to move beyond the traditional image of scholarship as an individual pursuit and to experience the acquisition of knowledge as a collaborative, community effort.

C. Problem-solver: The concept of problem-solver is not separate from the goals of the two concepts defined in A and B above. For that reason, the class discussions, activities, demonstrations, and micro teaching sessions are routinely framed in terms of analyzing what problems need to be solved, what information or material is necessary to solve them, and how that information or material may be acquired. This approach is applied to such topics as the development of motivational activities for diverse learners, the incorporation of state content standards into lesson planning, and the development of principled stands on issues of importance to the profession.

D. Partner: Class periods will include activities that model technique of cooperative peer instructions. Students are encouraged to develop both the skills and the attitudes necessary to foster routine, comfortable partnership-formal and informal- with pupils, parents, and colleagues.
 


 
 

SYLLABUS

Weeks

Topics and Assignments

Readings

Week 1

February 9

-          Introduction of the course;

-          the participants; 

-          basic terminology;

-          historic overview of foreign language methodology;

-          Is language teachable?

 

Week 2

February 16

 

  • Input, output and interaction in language learning
  • The teaching of vocabulary:  Total Physical Response (TPR)

Read:
-
Shrum & Glisan, Ch. 1

- Richards & Rodgers, Ch. 5

Week 3

February 23

 

  • The National Standards for Foreign Language Learning

·         Vocabulary: Design a 5-minute TPR activity and bring it to class. Students are to be ready to present their TPR lessons. Please bring the detailed script typed and hand it in at the end of the presentation along with any pictures used in the presentation. Don’t forget to include a reflection statement (explanation of what you wish to accomplish in each step).

·         Research paper topic (Grad. Students only): one page explaining what topic you are researching, why you chose this topic and its importance for you as a teacher. 

Read:

- Shrum & Glisan, Ch. 2

 

Investigate and print: 
- Delaware Goals and Standards for Foreign Language Education (identify content standards and performance indicators for your level of instruction)

Week 4

March 2 

  • Developing interpretive skills
  • Theory and practice of reading/listening in a foreign language (group work based on a text)
  • How to present a reading/viewing passage

·         Bring to class a short authentic text in target language from the WWW (Mandatory. write your name on the text). Group activity: designing a reading lesson based on the text.

·         Developmental assessment: a one-page summary of the first visit due.

Read:

-Shrum & Glisan, Ch. 6
 
 

Week 5

March 9 

  • Presenting grammar in the communicative classroom
  • Demonstration of an inductive grammar presentation

 

  • Teaching Resource Portfolio: The folder must contain:
  • One listening activity along with reflection (pedagogical foundations of your listening tasks). 
  • One reading activity along with reflection (pedagogical foundations of your reading tasks). 

Read:


-Shrum & Glisan,
Ch. 7
 
 
 

Week 6

March 16

  • Developing oral interpersonal and presentational skills
  • Teaching pronunciation
  • Error correction 
  • Cooperative learning
  • Information-gap activities

·         Teaching Resource Portfolio: Prepare a 4-6 minute inductive grammar presentation. Hand in the plan of the lesson (along with reflection) after your presentation. 


 Read:

Shrum & Glisan, Ch. 8

Week 7

March 23

  • Midterm exam.

 

 

Spring Recess: March 26-April 5.

 

Week 8

April 6
 

  • Developing written communication skills

 


 

Teaching Resource Portfolio: Develop a basic picture file with set of 8 to 10 pictures for 2 different topics (use 4 or 5 pictures for each topic). 

1.      Design one vocabulary activity for each topic using your picture file. 

2.      Design one information-gap activity for each topic.

3.      Provide reflection statement for each activity.

Read:


-Shrum & Glisan,
Ch. 9

Week 9

April 13 
 

  • Putting it all together:  Developing lesson plans

·         Teaching Resource Portfolio:  Develop one authentic writing task along with assessment rubric (don’t forget to provide reflection statement for writing task).


 Read:

 

Shrum & Glisan, Ch. 3
 

Week 10

April 20 

  • Using technology to contextualize and integrate language instruction

·         Teaching Resource Portfolio:  Develop an outline of your philosophy of teaching statement: Introduction (topics to be addressed), body (topics and subtopics), conclusion.

Read:

-Shrum & Glisan, Ch. 12 
 
 

Week 11

April 27
 
 
 

 

  • Learning styles
  • Student diversity
  • Teacher Behavior

·         Teaching Resource Portfolio: Develop course web site, and at least 4 different types of computer-based practice tasks using Quia (provide print out to be made part of your portfolio, along with reflection).

·         Developmental Assessment Project: 1st draft due

Read:

-Shrum & Glisan, Ch. 10
 
 

Week 12

May 4
 

  • Survey of approaches to foreign language teaching

Read:

Richards & Rodgers, Ch. 1-4 

Week 13

May 11
 

  • Survey of approaches to foreign language teaching

Grad. Students: Final Research Paper due

 

Read:

-Richards & Rodgers, Ch. 14, 17, 18

Week 14

May 18

 

  • Review

  • Developmental Assessment Project due.

 

 

 

 

Week 15

 Final exam to be announced.
 This syllabus is to be used as a guide. Changes may be made according to the needs of the class.

 


 

 

DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT


As part of the Foreign Language Methods course, the module described in this section aims to prepare student teachers to analyze, assess, and reflect on the impact they have had on their students' progress. The module is designed to provide student teachers with the tools they need to assess their performance as teachers by reflecting on their performance and by assessing their students' progress. In order to be able to conduct this developmental assessment, student teachers will learn how to gather data, analyze it, and present it in an organized manner. This training will enable them to conduct this assessment during the student teaching period. 

In order to be able to assess their performance, student teachers will be trained to use the following tools: First, they will learn to gather data using structured interviews or surveys in a foreign language teaching setting. Second, they will learn to describe assessments tools used to evaluate students' progress and relate these tools to the methodology used in the classroom. Finally, they will learn to provide the profile of at least one student including an account of his/her progress. 
 

 1. Early on i.e. by the end of the second week of instruction, students must secure a class to visit for this project. The student teacher will ask permission to sit in a 105 or 106 section of a language of their choice and observe the instructor's teaching for training purposes. Students who are observing classes in high school may base their projects on those classes and graduate students who are currently teaching may use one of their classes. Those students who do not belong to these groups must ask permission to visit a 105- section (Spanish, French or German).

2. The student teacher will describe at least two sessions: one session at the beginning of the semester (the second week of instruction) and one session at the end of the semester. For each session, the student teacher will provide a step-by-step description of what happened in the classroom: the structure of the class, the material presented, and the methodology used in the class etc. during those visits.

3. The student teacher will conduct a brief interview with the instructor. She/he will ask questions about the methodology used in her/his class, the assessment used and the rationale behind the instructor's choice of the methodology and the materials employs in that class.

4. The student teacher will select one or two students and provide her/his profile, progress, and the difficulties she/he encounters in the class.

5. The student teacher will assess the learner(s')' progress (i.e. the student(s) interviewed) based on the tools used in that course. Generally speaking, assessment tools in 105/106 courses include but are not limited to (i) Homework; (ii) Quizzes; (iii) Exams; (iv) Oral performance. The student teacher will provide a brief description of each tool and its components: grammar, vocabulary, listening, speaking, reading and writing skills, and culture. She/he will link the assessment tool to the methodology used to teach the course. She/he will discuss whether or not these components were all present in the assessment tools and how this affects students' progress. 

6. The final project, which will be a paper with an introduction, a development, and a conclusion, with a TABLE OF CONTENTS, will be a report that shows that the student teacher is able to carry out developmental assessments in a class she/he will student teach. Successful completion of the developmental assessment project means that the student teacher is able to show that her/his teaching has affected in some way the progress of her/his students.
 
 


THE FOLLOWING ARE SUGGESTED QUESTIONS TO ANSWER
AND ISSUES TO ADDRESS IN THE REPORT

I. Learning-teaching context 

 I. A. School Characteristics

    • Population (makeup and family profile). 
    • District (profile compared to other districts in the region). 
    • Student population and its profile. 
    • Needs of these students and how to meet them. 
    • Resources available to students (computers, library, grants, other). 
    • Programs available to students and how they meet their needs.
    • Relation between the programs and world languages. 
    • Are the programs integrated? 
    • Teacher evaluation program: does it exist? Does it apply to World Languages?
    • The mission statement of the school/district and how it relates to World Languages?

 I. B. Classroom Characteristics 

    • Grade, level or course
    • Students profile (were they together and since when?
    • Languages they speak or they have learned. 
    • Resources available for the classroom you observed. 
    • The number of groups in the class. Reason for having these groups instead of others.
    • Rules in the classroom: consequences, rewards, homework if not done etc.
    • Expectations for students. Actions and tasks the instructor expects her/his students to complete.

 I. C. Students Characteristics

    • Demographics: Number of students, gender categories, ethnic makeup etc.
    • Transportation and its impact on students if any (for instance fatigue, problems with transportation or with children who use transportation).
    • Chapter 1 program students etc. 
    • Proficiency ability in languages.

II. Achievement Targets

      • The curriculum and its objectives: (how do the objectives relate to the 5 Cs, to the State and national standards?) 
      • Targets for the instructional sequence as you identify them: (List of the targets: be as specific as you can and relate the targets to the State standards).


III. Assessment Plan

      • Formative or summative assessment. 
      • The extent to which achievement targets match assessment methods. 
      • The rationales for selecting the assessment methods. Correspondence with teaching method. Be explicit: course taught in such and such away. 
      • Assessments there are for students with special needs. 


IV. Sample of Instructional Sequence

      • Samples of Lesson Plans and methods used to teach the material.
      • Samples of Instructional Materials (such as a reading passage, cultural note or caption etc.)
      • Methodology used in the course: degree to which the method is communicative, accuracy oriented etc.


V. Analysis of Students Learning

      • Student Scores on Pre-Assessment 
      • Student Scores on Specific Tasks (or quizzes for Udel. courses)
      • Student Perceptions and Responses and how they react to the teaching method (from interviews) 


VI. Evaluation and Reflection

      • Your evaluation and reflection on the instructional sequence. Method(s) of teaching.
      • The extent to which achievement targets were met (using results from interviews and assessment tools) 
      • The questions and issues you have identified
      • Effective and successful aspects
      • Things that could be done differently.