GEOLOGY 113 Portfolio Project
Criteria for Developing
and Evaluating the Presentation


Presenters:
Lab Section:

Criteria for Content
Reasoning invalid, illogical 1 2 3 4 5 valid
Use of evidence slight, not helpful 1 2 3 4 5 ample, helpful
Connection to theory insufficient 1 2 3 4 5 sufficient
anomalies ignored anomalies treated
Criteria for Form/Style
Overall clarity unclear 1 2 3 4 5 very clear
Organization poor 1 2 3 4 5 excellent
Visual aids not helpful 1 2 3 4 5 helpful
Comments:



Note: The report is worth 20 points, but the criteria total 30 points, so a percentage is calculated to obtain a score out of 20.



Guideline Index Peer evaluation form
Geology 113 Home Page