|
|
|
|
|
|
| Women who are heavy smokers, have heart problems, or high blood pressure should not use | No such health limitations |
|
|
|
| 1 death in 500,000 abortions | 1 death in 200,000 abortions |
|
natural miscarriage |
|
|
and requires 2 trips to a doctor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the above table it can clearly be seen that medical abortions using
RU-486 are comparable to surgical abortions in terms of effectiveness.
The two methods are also comparable in terms of side effects and emotional
difficulties. Both methods offer advantages the other cannot offer.
RU-486 is a non-invasive procedure that can be taken in the privacy of
a woman's home, but the resulting abortion takes longer than a surgical
abortion and requires at least two visits to the doctor. Both forms
of abortion cause the woman some type of emotional suffering, but that
is to be expected. Lastly, each method has an optimum time period
for use. RU-486 is the only form of abortion that can be used very
early in pregnancy, but only up to seven weeks after conception.
Vacuum aspirations on the other hand, cannot be used as early as RU-486,
but can be used up to 12 weeks after conception.
For a woman that decides an abortion is her best choice, it is a personal
decision as to what method is preferred depending on how many weeks after
conception the abortion is to take place.
References:
www.religioustolerance.org/aboru486.htm
pages.map.com/lroberge/ru486.htm
www.cbctrust.com/RU486.96.html
www.prolife.com
www.laurushealth.com/Library/HealthGuide/IllnessConditions/topic.asp?hwid=tw1078
Introduction,
History
and Development, Structure
and Function,
Dosage
and Administration, Moral
and Religious Issues,
Conclusion