Roots: Exploring Our Distant Ancestry
Written by Harold B. White, University of Delaware
CHEM-667 BIOCHEMICAL EVOLUTION, Spring 2013

Who were your ancestors? Genealogy is a fascinating hobby for many people. Perhaps you heard your grandmother talk about her grandparents. If so, you may know more about your great great grandparents than most people. Sometimes family bibles will take records back a century or two - a few names, birth and death dates, and place of birth. That’s not much but you can be pretty sure the people mentioned had arms, walked upright, and breathed air. You would be hard pressed to find out hair color, eye color, intelligence, height, weight, and personalities of your ancestors only a few generations back. Alex Haley's hit book and TV series Roots traced an African-American family back 10 generations to Africa. This case study asks you to think of your ancestors in some cases more than a hundred million generations ago!

How much of your genealogy can you fill in? Can you trace the source of your mitochondria?



1. Ungraded, Individual work in class Wednesday, February 6, 2013

A. The table that follows lists 13 anatomical, behavioral, or physiological characteristics of different groups of living organisms that are not characteristics of humans. However, they are characteristics that may have been possessed by distant human ancestors. Examine the list and individually without discussion consider each characteristic as a separate hypothesis about your own distant ancestry.

B. Without worrying about evidence for the moment, fill in your position on each hypothesis - agree, disagree, or uncertain. In the final column, write a brief justification for your position. If you are uncertain of the meaning of a word, look it up in the dictionary available in the classroom.

C. In the final column, write a brief justification for your position. When you are done, raise your hand to be put in a group. Note: This will be a temporary group for today and next period.



 

Non-human Characteristic (Hypothesis)

Present in Human Ancestor?
Results from initial responses
Justification/Evidence
Yes
No
Not sure
1. Unicellular        
2. Aquatic        
3. Had a prehensile tail        
4. Had scales        
5. Photosynthetic        
6. Anaerobic        
7. Knuckle walker         
8. Egg laying          
9. Asexual         
10. Winged         
11. Had a chitinous exoskeleton         
12. Arboreal        
13. Fossorial        



Part 2. Ungraded, Group work in class Wednesday, February 6

A. When the group first forms and before it has any discussion on human ancestry, summarize the initial positions of all group members by entering the totals in each category. 
Do not try to reach consensus or argue your position at this point.

B. Discuss those hypotheses that lack group consensus or show the greatest amount of uncertainty. See if the group can reach consensus, agree or disagree, on each hypothesis.

C. At the end of class, turn in the group's table. Indicate whether the discussion moved the group toward consensus on the hypotheses having initial disagreement or uncertainty.  Also indicate in the margin, who will be investigating each disputed or unresolved hypothesis and reporting on it next period.  (One hypothesis per student.)



Part 3. Individual preparation for class Friday, February 8

A. At the end of class (2/6), identify those hypotheses that lack consensus and distribute them among the group members trying to match hypotheses with individual interests. Using resources available in the Morris Library and on the Internet, find out as much as you can about your hypothesis and be prepared to present a logical argument based on data supporting or refuting it.
B. Each group will present what they found out about possible characteristics of distant human ancestry.



Part 4. P/F Assignment, Individual work, due at the beginning of class Monday, February 11

Based on your discussions in class and further research as necessary, write a ~1-2 page argument based on evidence (provide references) that agrees, disagrees, or confirms uncertainty. Your findings will contribute to class discussion.



Return to Department's Home Page, CHEM-667 Home Page, or Hal White's Home Page.
Created 17 July 2000, Last updated 2 February 2013 by Hal White
Copyright 2013, Harold B. White, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716