Biographical Info on Fazang:
An incredibly prolific writer, Fazang produced more than sixty original works, commentaries on a wide variety of Buddhist texts, and meditation manuals, and participated in at least some of the Buddhist translation projects of his time. Much of his work centers on the exegesis of the Huayan Jing, which is sometimes referred to in Sanskrit as the Avatamsaka Sutra. A complete list of his works would be impractical, but a few of the major works are:
Fazang is often regarded as the grand systematizer of a tradition of Chinese Buddhism known as the Huayan school, named after the Huayan or "Flower Garland" Scripture (Skt. Avatamsaka Sutra). This school flourished during the so-called golden age of Chinese Buddhism, which culminated during the Tang Dynasty (617-907 AD). At that time, most of the Buddhist schools in China took as their basis one or another of the Buddhist scriptures, some authentic and some apocryphal. They did not ignore the other scriptures, but each seemed to regard a particular text as the highest expression of the Buddha's teaching. For example, the closest rival of the Huayan school, known as Tiantai, regarded the Lotus Scripture (Saddharma Pundarika Sutra) as the epitome of Buddhist teachings.
The message of the Huayan Scripture, as it is exposited by the tradition which bears its name, is primarily one of interpenetration and intercausality. The idea of a concrete Huayan tradition does not clearly emerge until after Fazang's time, and is somewhat retrospective. However, subsequent commentators and devotees designated Fazang as the third patriarch of the Huayan tradition, even though his systematization is perhaps the most sophisticated treatment of the Huayan view of the universe. He inherited a number of doctrines from his predecessors, most notably the idea of the "fourfold dharmadhatu," which constitutes in some sense the original formulation on which the whole tradition is based.
The term "dharmadhatu" (Skt.) or "fajie" (Ch.) refers to the realm of events which constitutes the omniverse. It extends in many dimensions of time and space, and is produced spontaneously and continuously through the interaction of all elements of existence. To speak of the "fourfold" dharmadhatu is to suggest that this omniverse can be seen from four different perspectives. These are:
Fazang was a favorite of the Empress Wu, because of his creativity in finding devices for vividly illustrating for her these abstract ideas, two of the most famous of which will now be described. The first of them is the hall of mirrors. Fazang had constructed a room lined with mirrors on all sides and on the ceiling and floor. In the center of the room he placed a candle. Not only was the candle reflected in each of the mirrors, but also each mirror reflected each other mirror, as well as itself reflected in every other mirror. The effect was as if you stood between two mirrors and saw an infinite regress of images, each contained within the other.
The other of his most famous devices was the account of a lion made of gold. The lion seemed to have hair, claws, eyes, etc., but all of this was in fact the same substance, gold. This illustrates how the single unique suchness of reality can seem to be differentiated, even though this differentiation is actually nothing more than an superficial and uncritical distinction.
Fazang characterized the Huayan view of the omniverse in terms of a heuristic device he called the "ten mysteries," though some of them overlap. He based his list on previous versions produced by his predecessors, though his is different in various ways.
The ten mysteries are:
These ten overlap, but offer various ways of understanding the interpenetration of phenomena with principle and with each other without obstruction. In some sense, this can be understood as the relation between a context and the elements which make up the context-the context depends on its elements just as the elements are meaningless outside of a context.
When Buddhism entered China, it did so in an unsystematic and piecemeal fashion. As a result, the tradition was diverse to the point of confusion. It wasn't immediately clear why there were such differences between different Buddhist doctrines. The Chinese tradition made sense of this diversity by organizing the different teachings into various kinds of categories, based either on the temporal sequence of the teaching, or the sophistication of the teaching, or the method of the teaching, and so on. Fazang's version of this classification, termed "panjiao" or "classification of doctrines," took the form of five different categories of teaching, based on their sophistication and varying accomodation to the limitations of sentient beings. His premise was that since humans differ in terms of talent for awakening, there must be different teachings to address these individual differences.
The five categories of Fazang's classification are:
Fazang's categorization is based on a heuristic though unconvincing historical model, in which the Huayan Sutra was the first Sutra preached by the Buddha while still within the throes of his enlightenment. Thus it most closely represents the enlightened view of the omniverse, without modification for the sake of clarity. According to this model, nobody understood a word of the sutra, so at that point the Buddha resorted to a series of teachings which took into consideration the limitations of sentient beings, with the intention of gradually leading them to overcome those limitations. Thus each subsequent teaching renders obsolete the previous ones, though they all continue to function so as to accomodate the greatest number of sentient beings.
Here is one important area in which the Huayan school differs from the Tiantai school. They both agree that the Huayan Sutra was the first sutra preached by the Buddha while still in the glow of the enlightenment experience, and that the Lotus Sutra was one of the last. But for the Tiantai school, this makes the Lotus the most valuable and important of the Sutras, since it is the most sophisticated and useful teaching in terms of accomplishing the awakening of sentient beings.
Fazang's insistence on finding an ontological ground for the operation and generation of the dharmadhatu has had a lasting effect on East Asian Buddhism. The priority he placed on the idea of the tathagatagarbha or "womb of Buddhahood" turned out to set the agenda for the subsequent development of the Mahayana tradition as found in China, Korea, and Japan. Even though the Huayan school eventually disappears as a separate tradition, its imprint can be found everywhere, especially in such traditions as Chan and eventually Japanese Zen. This search for an underlying ontological ground of the omniverse is, according to some scholars, entirely contrary to the traditional Indian Buddhist insistence that it makes no sense to speak of fundamental reality, and that in fact the search for such a bottom line is itself the disease that the Buddhist tradition is attempting to cure. Recently in Japan, a movement within the Buddhist scholastic community has emerged, calling itself "Critical Buddhism," which questions whether East Asian Buddhism can rightfully be called Buddhism at all, because of this apparent discrepancy.
Still, Fazang apparently found it possible to reconcile this apparent discrepancy through appeal to the traditional concept of upaya (Ch. fangbian), or "skillful means," which refers to the diagnostic and pedagogical skill of the enlightened master, which enables and justifies his use of whatever means are necessary to accomplish the awakening of sentient beings. As long as one does not take the formulation for the fact, one can use whatever teaching devices are at one's disposal to effect the necessary transformation.
- Alan Fox