Home
The Lab
The Lab Mates
Current Studies
Publications-Grants
Forced Fun Days
Past Mates

 

Current Studies

Studies Currently Seeking Subjects

1.  Biomechanical Factors Associated with the Etiology of Stress Fractures in Runners
bulletInvestigating lower extremity running injuries in women over a two-year period.
bullet400+ total women runners will be investigated (200 at UD & 200 at U. of Massachusetts, Amherst). 
bulletWomen runners with a minimum of 20 miles per week and between the ages of 18-30.
bulletData collection involves:
bulletBiomechanical Analysis (1 hour)
bulletLower Quarter Examination by Dr. Davis (30 minutes)
bulletX-rays of the lower leg (30 minutes)
bulletOnline Monthly Injury Updates (2 years)
bulletWomen runners are compensated $50.00 for participation in the study.
bulletContact Brian Noehren for more information.

Download Running Injury Flyer

 

Download RUNNING INJURY RESULTS from abstracts and manuscripts:

Dynamic Symmetry in Female Runners With a History of Tibial Stress Fractures (ASB/ISB 2005)

Intralimb Coordination in Female Runners With Tibial Stress Fractures (ASB/ISB 2005)

Kinetic Asymmetry in Left and Right Dominant Female Runners: Implications for Injury (ASB/ISB 2005)

Kinetic Asymmetry in Female Runners With and Without Retrospective Tibial Stress Fractures (ACSM 2005)

Does Sustaining A Lower Extremity Stress Factor Alter Running Mechanics (ASB 2004)

Prospective Study Of Factors Associated With Plantar Fasciitis (ASB 2004)

Lower Extremity Joint Coupling In Runners Who Developed Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (ASB 2004)

Lower Extremity Joint Coupling And Patellofemoral Pain During Running (ACSM 2004)

Does Increased Loading Lead To Tibial Stress Fractures (ACSM 2004)

Is The Free Moment Related To Tibial Stress Fractures (ACSM 2004)

Lower Extremity Mechanics In Patients With Patellofemoral Joint Pain: A Prospective Study (ASB 2003)

Prospective Iliotibial Band Syndrome (IT Band) (ACSM 2003)

Rearfoot Mechanics In Runners With Previous Plantar Fasciitis (ISB 2003)

Kinetic Variables In Runners With Previous Stress Fractures (ACSM 2002)

Structural Characteristics In Runners With And Without Stress Fractures (ACSM 2002)

Variables Associated With The Incidence of Stress Fractures (World Congress/ASB 2002)

Multiple Stress Fractures In A Cross Country Runner: A Case Study (CSM 2001)

 

2.  Runners With High Tibial Shock

bullet

The purpose of this study is to screen healthy, recreational runners to identify those runners that exhibit high values of tibial shock.

bullet

Tibial shock is an indicator of how hard the foot hits the ground during running.

bullet

High tibial shock values may increase the risk of sustaining a running injury.

bullet

Runners that are determined to have high tibial shock values may be recruited for a study that will be aimed at training the runner to reduce tibial shock during running.

bullet

Runners must be between the ages of 18 and 45, must be running a minimum of 10 miles per week, and be free of any leg injuries.

bullet

Tibial shock will be screened on both legs during the visit.

bullet

Total time for the data collection is approximately 60 minutes.

bullet

Contact: Philip Crowell

Download Tibial Shock flyer

3.  Gait Retraining

bullet

The purpose of this study is to identify running mechanics that are related to running injuries, and then improve injured peoples' running mechanics in hopes of running injury free.

bulletTo improve running mechanics, subjects participate in a Gait Retraining program:
bulletInitial Analysis: Subjects are evaluated for their running injury(s).
bulletA lower quarter exam is given.
bullet

Subjects are video taped running on a treadmill with their running style that led to injury.

bullet

A biomechanical analysis is performed on the injured running style.

bullet

Hypotheses are generated as to how to change running mechanics.

bullet6 Week Training Program: Attempt to alter subject's mechanics.
bullet

Subjects run on a treadmill while the Vicon Real-Time motion analysis gives continuous feedback as to segment angles.

bullet

Subjects must keep specified angles below or above a given threshold.

bulletPost Training: 6 month follow-up.
bullet

Biomechanical analysis.

bullet

6 subjects have completed the program thus far.

bullet

Contact: Dr. Irene Davis

 

 

4.  Biomechanics of Females With and Without Anterior Knee Pain

bullet

Active females from 18-35 years old are needed.

bulletData collection involves:
bulletAssessment of muscle strength
bulletAssessment of lower extremity structure
bulletMotion analysis during running, squatting, and jumping
bulletCompensation: $25.00
bulletContact: John Willson

 

Studies No Longer Seeking Subjects

1.  Arch Structure Differences Between Genders And Among Age Groups

bullet

The 2 goals of this study are:

bullet

1)  To examine the differences in arch height and arch flexibility between males and females and across people as they age.

bullet

2) To create a large, normalized database of arch heights from which a mean and standard deviation can be drawn to quantitatively identify high-, low-, and normal-arched feet in subsequent subjects.

bullet

It is hypothesized that with increasing age, males and females  will have lower, more flexible arches and that arch height will decrease, while arch stiffness will increase.

bullet

This is an ongoing study with 145 subjects collected thus far.

bullet

Status: Processing data.

bullet

PI: Becky Zifchock

 

2. Interaction Between Custom and Semi-Custom Orthoses and Arch Height

bullet

The orthotic part of the Arch study compared custom made orthotics to semi-custom orthotics.

bullet

This study involved:

bullet

1 pair of orthotics were made according to cast while a second pair of orthotics was selected according to foot size.

bullet

An 18 day accommodation period to get used to both pairs of orthotics was used.

bullet

After the accommodation period, a biomechanical analysis was done during running and walking for both pairs of orthotics.

bullet

Subjects were paid $50.00 and kept both pairs of orthotics, a $400 value.

bullet

Status: Processing data and developing manuscript.

bullet

PI: Becky Zifchock

 

3. Effects of In-Shoe Wedged Orthoses on Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis

bullet

Investigating the effects that in-shoe wedged orthoses have on lower extremity walking mechanics, pain and functional measures on subjects with medial and lateral compartment tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. 

bullet

120 subjects between 40-75 years of age.

bullet

Subjects must report knee pain greater than 3/10.

bullet Data collection involves:
bullet 1st visit: fill out a pain scale questionnaire, perform functional tests, receive shoes and get fitted for foot orthoses (1.5 hours).
bullet 2nd visit: fill out pain scale questionnaire again, perform functional tests again, and complete a biomechanical analysis (2 hours).
bullet

3rd visit: fill out pain scale questionnaire again, perform functional tests again, and complete a biomechanical analysis (2 hours).

bullet

Subjects receive a free pair of New Balance 811 walking shoes, free orthoses, and are compensated up to $100.00 for participation in the study. 

bullet

Status: Processing data


Download Knee Osteoarthritis Flyer

4. The Effect of Asymmetry on Injury Risk in Long Distance Runners

bulletInvestigating lower extremity injuries in runners over a 9 month period
bulletMales and females running at least 20 miles per week are needed
bulletVolunteers must be 18-45 years old and currently injury free
bulletData collection involves:
bulletAssessment of muscle strength
bulletAssessment of lower extremity structure
bulletAssessment of running patterns
bulletMonthly online injury reporting (9 months)
bulletCompensation: $25.00
bullet Status: Processing data

Download Asymmetry & Injury Risk flyer
   

Home | The Lab | The Lab Mates | Current Studies | Publications-Grants | Forced Fun Days | Past Mates

This site was last updated 01/18/06