|


Studies Currently Seeking Subjects
 1.
Biomechanical Factors Associated with the Etiology of Stress Fractures in
Runners
 | Investigating lower extremity running injuries
in women over a two-year period. |
 | 400+ total women runners will be investigated (200 at UD & 200 at U. of Massachusetts, Amherst).
|
 | Women runners with a minimum of 20 miles per week
and between the ages of 18-30. |
 | Data collection involves:
 | Biomechanical Analysis (1 hour) |
 | Lower Quarter Examination by Dr. Davis (30
minutes) |
 | X-rays of the lower leg (30 minutes) |
 | Online Monthly Injury Updates (2
years) |
|
 | Women runners are compensated
$50.00 for
participation in the study. |
 | Contact
Brian Noehren for more information. |
Download
Running Injury Flyer
Download RUNNING INJURY RESULTS from abstracts and manuscripts:
Dynamic Symmetry in Female Runners With a History of
Tibial Stress Fractures (ASB/ISB 2005)
Intralimb Coordination in Female Runners With Tibial
Stress Fractures (ASB/ISB 2005)
Kinetic Asymmetry in Left and Right Dominant Female
Runners: Implications for Injury (ASB/ISB 2005)
Kinetic Asymmetry in Female Runners With and Without
Retrospective Tibial Stress Fractures (ACSM
2005)
Does
Sustaining A Lower Extremity Stress Factor Alter Running Mechanics
(ASB 2004)
Prospective Study Of Factors Associated With Plantar Fasciitis (ASB 2004)
Lower Extremity
Joint Coupling In Runners Who Developed Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
(ASB 2004)
Lower Extremity
Joint Coupling And Patellofemoral Pain During Running
(ACSM 2004)
Does Increased
Loading Lead To Tibial Stress Fractures
(ACSM 2004)
Is The Free
Moment Related To Tibial Stress Fractures (ACSM 2004)
Lower Extremity Mechanics In Patients With Patellofemoral Joint Pain: A
Prospective Study
(ASB 2003)
Prospective
Iliotibial Band Syndrome (IT Band) (ACSM 2003)
Rearfoot
Mechanics In Runners With Previous Plantar Fasciitis
(ISB 2003)
Kinetic
Variables In Runners With Previous Stress Fractures
(ACSM 2002)
Structural
Characteristics In Runners With And Without Stress Fractures
(ACSM 2002)
Variables
Associated With The Incidence of Stress Fractures
(World Congress/ASB 2002)
Multiple Stress
Fractures In A Cross Country Runner: A Case Study
(CSM 2001)
2.
Runners With High
Tibial Shock
 |
The purpose of this study is to screen healthy,
recreational runners to identify those runners that exhibit high values of
tibial shock.
 |
Tibial shock is an indicator of how hard the foot hits
the ground during running.
|
 |
High tibial shock values may increase the risk of
sustaining a running injury.
|
|
 |
Runners that are determined to have high tibial shock
values may be recruited for a study that will be aimed at training
the runner to reduce tibial shock during running.
|
 |
Runners must be between the ages of 18 and 45, must be
running a minimum of 10 miles per week, and be free of any leg injuries.
|
 |
Tibial shock will be screened on both legs during the
visit.
 |
Total time for the data collection is approximately
60 minutes.
|
|
 |
Contact:
Philip Crowell
|
Download Tibial
Shock flyer
3.
Gait Retraining
 |
The purpose of this study is to identify running
mechanics that are related to running injuries, and then improve injured
peoples' running mechanics in hopes of running injury free.
|
 | To improve running mechanics, subjects
participate in a Gait Retraining program:
|
 |
6 subjects have completed the program thus far.
|
 |
Contact:
Dr. Irene Davis
|
4.
Biomechanics of Females With and Without
Anterior Knee Pain

Studies No Longer
Seeking Subjects

1.
Arch Structure Differences Between Genders
And Among Age Groups
 |
The 2 goals of this study are:
 |
1) To examine the differences in arch height and
arch flexibility between males and females and across people as they age.
|
 |
2) To create a large, normalized database of arch
heights from which a mean and standard deviation can be drawn to
quantitatively identify high-, low-, and normal-arched feet in subsequent
subjects.
|
|
 |
It is hypothesized that with increasing age, males and females
will have lower, more flexible arches and that arch height will decrease,
while arch stiffness will increase.
|
 |
This is an ongoing study with 145 subjects collected thus far.
|
 |
Status: Processing data.
|
 |
PI:
Becky Zifchock
|
2.
Interaction Between Custom and Semi-Custom Orthoses and Arch Height
 |
The orthotic part of the Arch study compared
custom made orthotics to semi-custom orthotics.
|
 |
This study involved:
 |
1 pair of orthotics were made according to cast while a second pair of orthotics
was selected according to foot size.
|
 |
An 18 day accommodation
period to get used to both pairs of orthotics was used.
|
 |
After the accommodation period, a biomechanical
analysis was done during running and walking for both pairs of orthotics.
|
|
 |
Subjects were paid
$50.00 and kept both pairs of orthotics, a $400
value.
|
 |
Status: Processing data and developing manuscript.
|
 |
PI:
Becky Zifchock
|
3.
Effects of In-Shoe Wedged Orthoses on Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis
 |
Investigating the effects that in-shoe wedged
orthoses have on lower extremity walking
mechanics, pain and functional measures on subjects with medial and lateral
compartment tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.
|
 |
120 subjects between 40-75 years of age.
|
 |
Subjects must report knee pain greater than 3/10.
|
 |
Data collection involves:
|
 |
Subjects receive a free pair of New Balance 811
walking shoes, free orthoses, and are compensated up to
$100.00 for
participation in the study.
|
 |
Status: Processing data
|
|